George Osborne lying AGAIN

The UK government have produced a report claiming that leaving the EU would cost the average household £4300.

Bollocks, and here's why you shouldn't believe that propaganda.

They have already told us that they wish to stay in, and that means that anything they say should be viewed with discern.

Also, remember this is the same government that lied to us about weapons of mass destruction, constantly lies about Syria, cant get the NHS right, doesn't plan properly for population growth and generally gets everything wrong.

Now consider this.Cameron declared that he is not on the fence about this issue. That kind of suggests that he has an iron in the fire doesn't it, he should be on the fence, he should be willing to do the public's will, that's the "supposed" purpose of democracy. Well, it is, unless your him, when it's about making money and gaining power rather than doing what the people want.

Don't believe his scare-tactics bullshit.  If there was this kind of cost to the UK overall, guess what(!) he could save more than that by staying the fuck out of foreign wars we shouldn't be waging in the first place.  But will he? Will he keep taking from the poor to fund the already rich and make war, all while pumping money into the EU?

David Cameron dislikes the welfare state.

The following text was taken from  a BBC news article. Text in bold was the article, non-bold text is my own thoughts on the issue. ( http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31464897 )

David Cameron has commissioned a health adviser to review whether people with obesity, alcohol or drug problems should have benefits cut if they refuse treatment to make them fit for work.


Translation : I believe that people in need, people who have no options or power should have their means for living and gaining any choice removed in order to make them powerless and less important.


About 100,000 people with such long-term, yet treatable, conditions are claiming sickness benefits.

Translation: People who have mental conditions that prevent them seeking aid, should pull themselves up by their own bootlaces!

Prof Dame Carol Black will consider whether the welfare system fails to encourage them to get treatment. 

Question: Is it the job of the welfare system to encourage people to seek treatment, or is that a fallacious argument? Surely it's the job of the welfare system to provide welfare.

The PM said it was unfair for workers to fund those who refuse such help.

Translation: The PM does not understand that is EXACTLY the point of the welfare system.

"Some have drug or alcohol problems, but refuse treatment," Mr Cameron said.

Point: Yes that is true. That is part of the condition of addiction. Mr Cameron does not understand that addiction is ADDICTION. But at least he can sit back satisfied in being a selfish ass.

"In other cases people have problems with their weight that could be addressed, but instead a life on benefits rather than work becomes the choice.

"It is not fair to ask hardworking taxpayers to fund the benefits of people who refuse to accept the support and treatment that could help them get back to a life of work."

Translation: We should force people against their will to take "help" that we force on them regardless of their actual issues, cares or beliefs.

"In particular, I have asked her to consider whether people should face the threat of a reduction in benefits if they refuse to engage with a recommended treatment plan.

Question: "Recommended treatment plan"... does that include visiting a state mandated,  Quango to make money for your friends Mr Cameron?

"It is vital that people who would benefit from treatment get the medical help they need."


Point: Except of course getting to treatment is difficult when the state has withdrawn the funds you need to get to the treatment.

Currently there is no requirement for people with such health problems to undertake treatment.

Comment: Well done BBC. In other news, freedom of choice, requires people to have choice.

About 60% of the 2.5 million people claiming sickness benefits have been doing so for more than five years.

Thought: Errr. What is the point of this statement? Shock horror! People who are sick,....have been claiming they are sick!!! More than five years? Well, let's see, people who have lost a leg, do those grow back?  The purpose of this statement is to deliberately make sick people look and sound like leeches. That is it's entire purpose. It's a "scare" tactic, nothing more.

Dame Carol said: "I am deeply interested in trying to overcome the challenges these types of benefit claimants pose.

WTF: They pose you a challenge? Sick people, people in need, pose you a challenge. Do you mean they need help, or you want to find a way to take away what little happiness they have?

"These people, in addition to their long-term conditions and lifestyle issues, suffer the great disadvantage of not being engaged in the world of work, such an important feature of society."

Translation: As a society, we find people who are not good-little-robots a real pain in the ass and want them to feck off. In fact we want to remove the welfare state and funnel that money into our own pockets.

Politicians that can't stop talking out of their anus

We've just had some local elections, the trend is that UKIP have gained a lot of seats at the expense of the Conservative and Liberal parties.

This morning I heard an interview with a Liberal representative and this evening an interview with a Conservative representative. In both interviews the representative was questioned about their partie's losses.

In both cases the politicos responded by saying that was actually a positive sign that their policies and campaigning is paying off...

In what world is that true?

You spineless lying pieces of crap. It's an unmitigated disaster for both of you. Both parties described UKIP and a bunch of racists rats, and then proceeded to lose seats to them. As far as I can see if your party is losing to people you think are scum and filth, but you see it as positive then there really must be something wrong with your perspective. 

Then to have the audacity to meet the media and calmly lie your arses off telling us how good it is...words fail me in trying to describe what total and utterly useless spineless pricks you are.

You lost. Admit it, and move on.  This burying your head in the sand and failing to stand up like men (or women) shows what is wrong with politics in this country.  You're all so lily livered and running scared of the whips (and considering your own career above the people you're supposed to serve) that I feel you all need to be kicked the hell out of power and replaced by people with some kind of a back bone.